For generations, owning a home has been hailed as the pinnacle of success. It’s seen as the ultimate investment—a symbol of stability, security, and accomplishment. The narrative is simple: renting is temporary, but buying a home secures your financial future. Historically, this belief was rooted in economic realities. Real estate values tended to rise, a thirty-year mortgage was viewed as an investment in retirement, and property ownership was a hallmark of success.
However, times have changed. Societal norms, economic realities, and professional demands have transformed how we live and work, challenging the traditional ideal of home ownership. Today, this once-sacred dream often looks more like a financial and emotional trap.
Evolving Realities of Modern Life
The world we live in today is far more dynamic than it was when the home ownership ideal took root. People move cities, states, and even countries more frequently—whether for work, lifestyle changes, or to escape unfavorable policies. Owning a home can restrict mobility and create significant financial headaches if selling becomes necessary in an unpredictable housing market.
Beyond mobility, government policies and economic shifts also play a role. For example, rising property taxes have made home ownership increasingly expensive. Worse yet, the risk of losing a home over missed payments has grown, with governments wielding eminent domain powers not just for public projects but for private developments as well. This means that even a “paid-off” home is not necessarily secure.
The Hidden Costs of Owning a Home
The financial burden of home ownership extends far beyond a mortgage payment. Maintenance costs, property taxes, and zoning restrictions often create additional expenses and frustrations.
Maintenance costs have risen dramatically, with labor and materials becoming increasingly expensive. Property improvements, which once boosted value, now require navigating endless bureaucratic hurdles. For instance, simple additions to a home can require costly approvals from zoning boards, while land designated as wetlands might be entirely off-limits for development.
These challenges are compounded by restrictive homeowners’ association (HOA) rules. Designed to protect property values, HOAs often become overly politicized, creating layers of restrictions and conflicts that erode the sense of community they were meant to foster. Over time, the rules meant to ensure harmony often limit flexibility and create unnecessary disputes.
Rethinking Investments: Free Cities and Beyond
In today’s world, renting is no longer a sign of failure but a practical choice that offers flexibility and financial freedom. Instead of sinking resources into a single property, many individuals are opting to invest in opportunities that align with their lifestyle and values.
In Free Cities, for instance, the model shifts from individual home ownership to city-wide investment. Residents can rent their living spaces while becoming shareholders in the city itself, benefiting from its overall growth and prosperity. This approach aligns personal financial goals with the success of the community, offering a more dynamic and diversified investment.
By decoupling where you live from where you invest, individuals gain the freedom to move, adapt, and seize opportunities without the financial anchor of home ownership. This model not only fosters flexibility but also emphasizes the shared incentives that drive community well-being.
Is the Dream Still Worth It?
For many, the emotional pull of owning a home remains strong. There’s pride and comfort in having a place to call your own. But in today’s fast-changing world, it’s worth asking: does home ownership fit modern realities?
The dream of owning a home often masks its drawbacks. It can limit mobility, create financial strain, and subject owners to endless bureaucratic and regulatory challenges. Meanwhile, alternatives like renting, investing in broader opportunities, and participating in Free Cities offer the kind of flexibility and financial alignment that modern life demands.
As we rethink what it means to thrive, it’s time to question whether the dream of home ownership is truly worth pursuing—or whether it’s an outdated myth holding us back from embracing a brighter, more adaptable future.
I respect your work and your arguments but I propose they are missing a few very key points, both quantitatively and intrinsically. First, from purely an investment standpoint, adjusted for volatility, real estate has been the top performing asset over the long run, even better than equities. Mobility is only one piece of the puzzle and there are intrinsic benefits around familial stability, and family formation, etc. Thirdly, It's a hard asset with (implied) cashflows that move with the price of rents. Fourthly, It's more likely, for those in western economies, that the market prices you out with rent increases than your government steals your home outright or through Fiat, taxation, etc.
Lastly, If you aren't going to own the home you live in (and ignore the tax benefits), you should at least own real estate you can rent out to others. After all, why doesn't the honorable Mr. Mazzone, who I respect greatly, simply rent the land/property from someone else instead of buying the property to build and rent out? The control of the asset is the most valuable piece.
Overall, these benefits outweigh the mobility arguments for most individuals and allow us to directly "hedge" against housing inflation (one of life's biggest risks) at the same time.
If you don't own the home, someone else does.
What happens if that someone doesn't like you any more for whatever reason?